CONGRATULATIONS MAYOR-ELECT ADRIAN FENTY! You and the council member winners of the 2006 elections deserve real praise for your accomplishments on behalf of the District of Columbia electorate. In the coming months before and after your transition, it is my hope that every effort will be made to assist you and the council in an effective effort to empower and improve our city-state. No doubt, genuine and convincing action must be taken to reach out to the more than two-thirds of District voters not participating in the District’s electoral process. I’m praying for your success.

REALITY CHECK: The District of Columbia’s Coming Fiscal Crisis >

PROMISES & CAMPAIGN HYPE vs REAL CHANGE

Pretentious public officials, news media elected candidates and assorted special interests continue to divide and control our city. Behind the headlines, District of Columbia residents are reaching the breaking point of socioeconomic discontent. The hype and deception continues. Recent US Census figures, when sorted and filtered for actual full-time non-transient residents, show the reality of DC population losses in families, permanent residents, and long-term middle-class taxpayers. These losses will create the coming District budget deficits and fiscal imbalances -- especially when much of our money will go to a new baseball stadium, dysfunctional DC agencies, and other revenue wasting mayoral initiatives. Two-thirds of DC Primary voters would not vote for the hype -- or the hypocrisy of democracy, and special interest candidates. Hopefully, most will vote for real change on Tuesday, November 7.
Over 285,000 District voters want real change. District discontent continues and, in many respects, it has increased throughout diverse hard working communities. Though many have chosen to leave DC, it should be no surprise that our rising discontent has less to do with an affiliation to any political party, economic status, ethnic group, ward issue, or the unresolved community complaints passed over by our District public officials.
Our discontent is deeply rooted in the serious lack of real accountability, respect and effective action on the actual common needs of DC residents. This discontent can be eliminated by a mayor with the genuine will, innovative leadership and a real action plan to aggressively and always act in the best interest of District citizens first.
An empowerment oriented progressive Republican mayoral candidate in a major city-state long dominated and dependent on Democratic public officials may seem like an impossible challenge -- and received little media attention. But, I confidently believe most District voters are way ahead of the unaccountable officials acting on an alleged “mandate” and “landslide” hype. Can we afford 4 more years of self-serving promises based on shaky  records that provided us minimal socioeconomic empowerment? Are low expectations our standard?
Ironically, these same public officials heard, mismanaged and

Christopher Keeley Photo

paid lip service to the same problems they now claim they want to resolve -- now that they are a mayoral or council candidate. No doubt, we can no longer find comfort in public officials who are again all too comfortable with another four or more years of unaccountable, misguided, pretentious, stale and arrogant District governance.
Older and younger DC voters, longtime and newer residents, as well as families of diverse incomes know the true source behind the decline of truly affordable, safe, prosperous, productive family-friendly living for all District residents. Moreover, we know it is time for real leadership, choice and change.
My mayoral candidacy represents real choice for change. We now know this is the time to make REAL change rather than TALK about it. I am empowered by many District of Columbia residents, like you, who told me the time has come for genuine leadership of change -- a change to policies and priorities benefiting us, the people -- change to a new standard of DC leadership.
Vision without a real action plan is just an empty promise.

FINALLY! A Public Servant That Serves PEOPLE!

It has always been my contention that the present and future of the District of Columbia resides in the collective potential of its people. The purpose and responsibility of elected public officials is to provide effective leadership and resources that are accountable, forward thinking, and rooted in present day realities -- a mayor focused on serving people. Every DC resident, including the businesses that serve and support us, should be treated respectfully and attentively as a strategic investment for the greater good of our entire city-state. Electing this quality of leadership, integrity and determination for action is what will strengthen and benefit us all. Using the true value of our vote to elect this leadership is the only guarantee.

Our Exponential Potential

Maurice G. Fitzgerald - The Washington Informer

Nearly 20 years ago, when I first came to permanently live in the District of Columbia from Harlem, there was always a strong sense of what was best about DC, and its greater potential. The sense of family, community, upward mobility, and years of family gatherings with local DC relatives and friends from the 1960s to 80s only strengthened what I already knew. Our hometown, 'The Nation's Capital' and the global center of democracy, can be a real reflection of our true collective potential for genuine socioeconomic empowerment -- our exponential potential.

As Mayor Moore, I will provide a new and higher standard of leadership and motivation that enables diverse District government agencies, proactive public servants, vital community groups, neighborhood associations, families, youth energy, senior wisdom, neighborhood small businesses, DC-based organizations and diverse members of our valuable corporate sector to empower all District residents.

It has always been my contention that the present and future of the District of Columbia resides in the collective potential of its people. The purpose and responsibility of elected public officials is to provide effective leadership and resources that are accountable, forward thinking, and rooted in present day realities -- a paradigm shift benefiting people. Every DC resident, including the diverse businesses that serve and support us, should be treated respectfully and attentively as a strategic investment for the greater good of our city-state.

We have the potential to be a major new state that serves as an example for other sovereign states to follow. History has proven, throughout many civilizations, a society’s greatest potential resides in its people. As I clearly learned from working on Wall Street to K Street, a carefully managed investment produces exponential dividends that enriches and sustains us all. We, and the investment we make in ourselves, are the true source of exponential potential. District leadership that settles for anything less deserves no opportunity to lead.

Dennis Moore Mayor For A New Washington

Real Choice - Real Change . . . If we cannot provide truly affordable housing in the District, then what is the point of planning a future -- a future where diverse permanent residents who generate permanent tax revenues cannot afford to live here? We cannot afford to continue policies, scams and schemes that are robbing the pockets of District residents. People-oriented priorities will be my priority. I will not compromise on quality affordable housing, first class schools, aggressive crime prevention, citywide resident employment, expanded community-based small business development, functional healthcare access, environmental safety -- and most of all, genuine government accountability. Too many public officials continue to be satisfied with happy-talk hype and pretentious progress. After 12 years, their business-as-usual policies are a corruption of a responsibility provided by District of Columbia citizens. Educational Empowerment . . . In reality, the miseducation of all District of Columbia children and the mismanagement of our schools are in fact a form social and economic discrimination -- a form of administrative policy that becomes a barrier to future empowerment. Throughout the history of the District, and even the world, education has been society's most valuable socioeconomic commodity. Knowledge is the root of social achievement and economic power. A Moore administration will mandate guaranteed full funding for preschool to college education, including free employment training for adults and ex-offenders. Educated and trained citizens are an economic and social asset. In a fast changing local and global economy, the time is overdue to remove the barriers. We have a responsibility to empower our children. Aggressive Crime Prevention . . . While growing up, the most important thing I learned about neighborhood crime is -- random violence respects no one -- and bullets don't knock on doors. No crime statistic, no amount of after-the-fact reaction -- and no amount of self-serving political speeches on accomplishments will bring back a life lost to crime. Sooner or later, when an effective anti-crime policy is not in place, street crime and violence invades our home. For the families who lost so much too soon -- for our children who cannot grow in peace and the families who live in fear -- it is time to stop the invasion. Untapped Potentials . . . The District of Columbia has the highly enviable status of being our hometown, 'The Nation's Capital' and a global power center. Yet, there is room for our untapped potential as a major homegrown center for world class education, business, technology, arts, entertainment and socioeconomic innovation. We owe the struggles of the pasts, the potentials of the present, and the promise of a dynamic future our very best efforts to make our hometown-global-capital a jewel that shines for ALL of us. The bottom line in this election year is making a real choice for real change. My campaign is for District residents who want leadership that will make it happen -- BE about it and not just TALK about it.

There is a rush to lay a large load of concrete and steel, and spend more taxpayer money before Election Day and

Photos Courtesy of The Washington Post DC Wire

2008 -- despite the lack of thorough environmental impact studies, and guaranteed economic benefits -- beyond the truth that District taxpayers WILL pay for this special interest scam. Expect substantial fiscal imbalances and DC budget deficits after 2007.
But, for now, more of our money  will go to escalating excuses to spend more of our money on baseball related projects. As a genuine fiscally accountable Republican, I have great concerns about this taxpayer funded nickel-and-dime deal -- disguised as a revenue generating DC baseball stadium. Another real example of our officials spending the rent money to buy more lottery tickets.
Beyond the hype, happy-talk, and flood of Washington Nationals baseball caps, what happened to that spending cap? -- and what’s behind the doors of those back door deals?
First, the logic of creating the "Office of Baseball" or de facto DC Baseball Commission is pretentious and costly even at $750,000. How many new textbooks or classroom computers will that buy for DC students? How many homeless families can receive permanent housing, rather than warehousing? How much random crime will not be prevented? Where did this “magic money” come from? Where is the real money for a family-friendly DC, and schools? Can you spell  f-e-d-e-r-a-l  i-n-d-i-c-t-m-e-n-t-s ?
Thinking that another level of bureaucracy will stabilize and validate a bad deal is like putting a crown and gown on a gorilla, then calling it a beauty queen. Was this deal so shaky that only high risk takers would bite? Again, what happened to that “spending cap?”
No doubt, I like baseball -- though less so compared to DC basketball, soccer, hockey and live stage entertainment. The deeper and long-term fiscal truth behind the Washington Nationals baseball stadium is that it's a nickel-and-dime deal hyped as multimillion-dollar baby -- a baby we cannot afford to have, which becomes expensive over time. Remember the Redskins, the Senators, and the RFK-based neighborhood economic benefits hype? Economics 101: Current and future costs must never exceed actual economic benefits.
Having questioned some of the principals at the rarely held public meetings, I am thoroughly convinced that their best financial projections will reap only minimal and seasonal revenue for the District of Columbia. Filtering through the zigzag answers to my direct questions about the stadium's long-term financial benefit, versus the actual cost to DC taxpayers, they admitted their projected benefits are at best "a gamble." Even most risk-taking Wall Street bankers have long ago run away from this type of shaky cost/benefit formula being hyped in this DC stadium deal. Do local public officials think that DC stands for Dumb Citizens? To keep families in DC, and pay for schools and other initiatives, we must develop real revenue generating projects.
Gambling with other people's money -- DC's hard-earned taxpayer revenue -- is not my idea of genuine fiscal responsibility and true accountability for public priorities. My idea of building an Ellington Center on the same footprint of the stadium is designed to produce exponential economic and social benefits. Ellington Center will be a dynamic year-round entertainment, arts, technology and retail shopping megaplex containing an indoor multimedia family amusement park, a multi-use sports arena, 2 live performance auditoriums, the Capital Life & History Museum, 21st century public library, a hotel, 20 video and film theaters, 3 floors of stores, office space, an onsite medical facility, childcare services, DC police security center, customer service training school, easy Metro bus and train access, as well as multilevel underground parking.
My best financially conservative economic projection reveals that Ellington Center will generate at least 2,000 full time sales, administrative, service and professional support jobs for District residents, and a minimum of $250 million dollars in annual revenue -- all in the same stadium construction space. Yet, it can be built for less than $350 million of the nearly $1 billion dollars that taxpayers will be billed for the Washington Nationals stadium. Much of that $350 million for Ellington Center’s construction will be funded by the major entertainment, amusement and retail companies that will jump at the opportunity to have a high profile presence in "The Nation's Capital." The multiple sources of real revenue generated out of sales, property, business and employment taxes from Ellington Center will have an immediate and long-term economic impact on greater funding for genuine public priorities -- priorities like first class schools, truly affordable housing, effective healthcare services, public safety, including a major reduction in resident and business taxation pressures.
This exponential economic benefit is increased when you include the millions more in tourist dollars, as Ellington Center becomes a priority attraction for millions of year-round visitors to the District. Again, I'm talking about year-round long-term socioeconomic benefit, not the seasonal speculative gamble that the stadium deal will gain for Major League Baseball owners -- and the future fortunes of the public officials who backed their deal.
Ellington Center, named in honor of DC's favorite son and America's national treasure Edward Kennedy 'Duke' Ellington, will have the desired economic benefit that diverse District of Columbia residents know is needed for our many people-oriented priorities. Innovative, fiscally responsible projects create more District jobs and multiple sources of real revenue. Long-term year-round revenue generating projects reduce the growing tax burden on residents and businesses. Moreover, it sustains reliable and effective funding for real public priorities. It also maintains a high bond rating and value for DC. Only new, clear-thinking, leadership can see the big picture benefits and long term advantages.
DC's relationship and history with baseball ventures is not a pretty one. The losing legacy that this team had before and since coming to the District is an economic omen that will generate financial nightmares for years to come. Despite the legendary and able skills of ‘Nats’ manager Frank Robinson, these nightmares won’t be soothed by linking the cost of this bad deal with the trickle-down revenue expected from the vocal minority of DC and non-District suburban baseball boosters. When the reality check of year 2008 and long-term bills for this fiasco come due, I wonder how many fans will be fanatical about their decision.
The news photos of near-empty RFK stadium seats don't lie -- unlike the public

Photo Courtesy of The Washington Post DC Wire

officials who approved this over-hyped high profile boondoggle. Even low-panning TV cameras can't hide what the baseball bean counters already know. As my Dad, an avid baseball fan, used to say about used car dealers who want your money: "The louder and faster they talk, the more they lie."
The deep discontent about how paid and elected DC officials have become drunk over spending our taxpayer money will awaken an angry sleeping giant that will vote in this election year and beyond. Their administrative arrogance, ongoing fiscal irresponsibility, socioeconomic insensitivity, and overall operational unaccountability will fuel the blow-back they didn't predict. No wonder there is a rush to lay a large load of concrete and steel before Election Day this November -- and definitely before a new, clear thinking, fiscally responsible, and genuinely accountable mayor takes the Oath of Office on Inauguration Day this January.  Again, DC does not mean Dumb Citizens!
All the reasons, among many more, why I am a candidate for District of Columbia mayor.

Your e-mail address will never be shown on the Moore For People website, and will never be shared with any other organizations or entities. Some responses will be posted. Thank you, respectfully, for your feedback.

“Leadership is not just the ability and the will to lead. It is best shown by a leader that also listens and acts on the common voices and actual needs of the people. While others campaign to be the next mayor, my candidacy is for the responsibility to be your advocate for real people-oriented policies that empower District residents. ‘Moore For People’ is not a campaign slogan -- it is the core of my mission for a genuinely better and New Washington.”

Dennis Moore - Mayor For A New Washington

In The Beginning . . . Born and raised in Harlem during the turbulent 1950s-1960s, to firm and nurturing self-empowered parents, required that I have a genuine sense of activism and personal responsibility. Though I have worked as a network radio news journalist, local radio news director, government and finance public affairs specialist, adult education teacher, and Internet news publisher (BOOKSandWORDS.com) for the last 25 years, I'm still an assertive citizen-activist at heart. This activism also stems from my high school and college days as a student activist for minority student and education issues. This was bolstered earlier by my parent's traditional and "DO something about it!" outlook on various social issues while growing up in New York City and Savannah, Georgia. As the older son of an Army paratrooper father from Harlem and a senior insurance clerk mother from Georgia, I learned a lot about the critical importance of empowerment and real accountability. My greatest achievement as a high school student activist was helping to successfully negotiate an expanded citywide employment program for qualified Black and Latino teachers, including high school college preparation courses, career-oriented classes, and an ethnically sensitive history and culture curriculum for Black and Latino students during 1969-71. The student, parent, teacher and community coalition, I was the student representative for, laid an equitable and solid foundation in New York City's plan for public school teacher diversity and curriculum improvements existing today. This is why educational and socioeconomic empowerment remains my priority over 30 years later -- a priority I will definitely act on as Mayor Moore.
The Inside Outsider . . . The reality behind DC government is actually worse than the public perception. I have worked in key areas inside District government for District of Columbia Public Schools Office of the Superintendent (Office of Parent Affairs), and in public affairs for the Office of the Chief Financial Officer. My public affairs duties afforded me great access, insight and indisputable evidence about all that is exceptionally right and far too much that is genuinely wrong in District government. Quite frankly, from my perspective as someone engaged in helping to smooth the public image of these agencies, the dysfunction is far beyond what the public actually sees and suffers. Most specifically, I was a witness to the shell game policies that shifts money from critical public needs that ends up in blind budgets for short term special interest projects and events -- Grand Prix racing, new convention center, summer Olympics sports promotion, luxury development, Major League Baseball stadium, and the list goes on -- all of this, and more, while our school system still deteriorates, unaffordable housing increases, HIV/AIDS infections expand, random violent crimes continues, overtaxed homeowners are stressed, District government operations remain dysfunctional, and greater numbers of residents give-up and leave. As mayor, I will merge tested and practical policies, with innovative ideas and effective action. At every level and agency of my administration I will aggressively promote a climate of competent administration, long-term fiscal responsibility, effective-friendly citizen services, and genuine full accountability to every DC resident. Under the leadership of a Moore Administration, the District of Columbia will be the first choice home of diverse and empowered everyday people -- whether you work hard to earn $10,000 or $100,000 per year.
The Discontent of Many . . . District discontent continues and, in many respects, it has increased throughout diverse socioeconomic communities. Many have chosen to leave DC. By now, it should be no surprise that our discontent has less to do with our affiliation to an ethnic group, economic strata, or political party. Our discontent is deeply rooted in the serious lack of accountability and effective action on the actual needs of everyday residents. This discontent can and must be eliminated by a mayor that has the genuine will and innovative leadership to act in the best interest of District of Columbia citizens. I also know, at this particular time, a Republican mayoral candidate in a city-state dominated by Democratic public officials may seem like an impossible challenge. But, I confidently believe and know that diverse District voters are way ahead of the usual crop of unaccountable officials and candidates making the same self-serving predictable promises. No doubt, we can no longer find comfort in public officials who are comfortable with another four-plus years of unaccountable, misguided, stale and arrogant governance. Older and younger DC voters, longtime and newer residents, as well as families of diverse incomes know the true source behind the decline of truly affordable, safe and productive living for all residents. Moreover, we know it is time for real change. My mayoral candidacy represents real choice for change. I am empowered by the many DC residents, like you, who told me the time has come for leadership of change -- a change to policies and priorities for people.
The Proactivist Candidate . . . Having lived and worked in Washington-DC for nearly 20 years, I've discovered that my professional pursuits have not relieved me from a very avid and highly informed interest in activist politics. During the 2002 DC mayoral elections, I vigorously explored my potential as an Independent candidate for mayor, rooted in people-oriented policies and higher standards of governance. Unfortunately, the deep discontent among diverse voting and non-voting District residents about our local electoral process, the distraction of campaign scandals, and voter disgust from the usual cast of candidates left limited opportunities to motivate major attention. As a loyal and aware DC resident, I deeply empathize and understand the reasons for this discontent -- and what can be done to change it. Any candidate that cannot fully guarantee a continuous commitment to people-oriented priorities does not deserve your vote. I will not be that candidate or mayor. Leadership that ignores this responsibility does not deserve to lead.
Empowerment & Potential . . . During many family and professional experiences in and beyond the District, there was always this strong sense of a greater potential for DC life and living that was being suppressed. As a 53 year-old father of two and grandfather of three with a wealth of experiences, I have no doubt that our greater potential will come from leaders dedicated to immediate and long-term policies of empowerment for Washington's most challenged communities, struggling middle class, and our private sector partners. The history and warnings are totally clear on the dangers of cities and officials that grow socioeconomic divisions among its citizens. Public officials that are serious and single-minded about empowering people must build the strongest bridge between this divide. Leadership that clearly understands the shared benefits of having successful communities everywhere in the District must be elected to grow our empowerment. I have always said that 'The Nation's Capital', "our hometown," and the people that sustain it must be the most obvious examples of what's best in America. My public policy priorities will insure that our local government, public officials and capable public servants are held fully accountable for aiding and strengthening the empowerment of every District of Columbia resident. The challenges ahead, and the expectation of obstacles, will be motivation for greater innovative effort. Effective people-oriented policies will be the foundation of a Moore Administration. This is the foundation a united District of Columbia will be built on. Unlike any other DC mayor, genuine empowerment will be my standard.
Real Choice for Real Change . . . My candidacy is about the real choice and real change we have all expected for the last twelve years. We now know, more than ever, this is the time to BE about making change rather than TALK about it. Our ability to choose the best in us can overcome what we have settled for over the years. I am completely confident in my ability to effectively empower every District resident through people-oriented priorities.

Dennis Moore - Mayor For A New Washington

Nevertheless Mr. President . . . We have to leave Iraq, intelligently fight the war on terrorism, and stop the ongoing war on America’s working class and middle class citizens. Nearly a 150 years later, as our first Republican president said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” No words are truer and more appropriate in these times. Hopefully, in the immediate years ahead of us, there will be a more competent and cooperative effort by all to focus on the genuine public needs that matter most to every American.

Our Not So New “Crime Emergency”

Almost daily, I have an opportunity to speak directly with police officers and everyday DC residents. It is no surprise to me that the most common and consistent concern I hear from everyone is that crime is out of control. To quote most MPD officers, "We are the ones who are handcuffed." In the words of a longtime resident, "It's a damn shame the police are now being paid to not do their job." Surely, you and I know, it wasn't always that way -- and there's no reason for it today.
Clearly, many committed MPD officers will tell you, there is a systemic problem rooted in regulations that block effective neighborhood-based crime prevention. Any District resident or police officer (and criminal) can tell you, presence and prevention public safety strategies are major weapons against crime. Declaring a "crime emergency" reveals a major failure in prevention.
Surely, real public safety planning requires an equal measure of tactical strategy, consistency, leadership and will. If there is no consistent will in our leadership for an effective public safety strategy, then how many crime emergencies must District neighborhoods prepare for?
Any MPD or Metro officer can tell you, the key element in neighborhood crime prevention is proactive police presence. Simply meaning, being there and watching before it can happen. Potential criminal activity and a proactive police presence rarely exist in the same space -- our neighborhoods. Criminals, and "wannabe" criminals, don't and won’t go where they can't commit a crime -- more police on streets and less in seats.
The bottom line for me, MPD officers, and frustrated residents is how much of our neighborhoods do we control. Block by block, and alley by alley, under a Moore Administration the police and people will be in control. Through expanded resident and police partnerships, aggressive enforcement strategies, one-on-one relationships, constant observation, and effective zero-tolerance tactics we can regain the peace and comfort of our diverse neighborhoods again. Public safety is about action, not reaction.
My OPS (Overall Public Safety) plan is about walking our streets without fear and enjoying our neighborhoods without stress. OPS is also about closer one-on-one relationships with the exceptionally brave men and women we pay to protect us, and who want to provide truly effective public safety for all of us -- not just the business and shopping areas where most of us don’t live. Strategic neighborhood deployment is critical.
A safe and functional District of Columbia has greater value for residents, visitors, and the business community. As Mayor Moore, expanded day and night street patrols will be the new standard. I will be committed to creating 16 ward-based 24-hour Community Outreach Policing Service (COPS) programs that establish and maintain strong partnerships and participation from residents. More resources and guaranteed funding will be provided to target and prevent diverse criminal activity with 8 ward-based plainclothes police units. I will aggressively seek an increase in penalties and the expansion of enforcement against illegal weapons possession, drug distribution, rape and robbery.
A backlog of nearly 5,000 unsolved DC murders is an absolute disgrace I will empower our police department to resolve. Our city-state, under a Moore Administration, WILL have a state-of-the-art forensic crime and cold case Criminal Intelligence Center within my first year in office. The stories of far too many tragic deaths will be brought to closure for the families and communities that continue to suffer. Overwhelmed, yet very capable, MPD detectives will receive the logistical and investigative tools they desperately deserve. Full funding will not be an issue. Politics, and politricks, will never trump public safety under my standard. My goal is to sustain our MPD at or beyond national policing standards. As our city-state’s chief executive and primary public guardian, I will not allow any lesser standard that jeopardizes the life of any District citizen or visitor, or the professional expectations of our officers. The CIC will be just one of several assets in my Overall Public Safety plan for a genuinely safe and peaceable District of Columbia. We all deserve nothing less.
There is no doubt, crime prevention is also related to socioeconomic empowerment. The Moore Administration will take an aggressive and holistic approach that raises the level of educational preparedness in our schools, paid vocational training programs, life skills with conflict resolution counseling, year-round youth programs, and expanded business partnerships for all-year job opportunities. The connection is clear -- there’s no time to do crime when there’s a real job to perform, and be paid a living wage. This is a major part of what creates and expands genuine socioeconomic empowerment.
Yes, it is "a damn shame" that there has to be an announced "crime emergency" when criminals have been emerging around our homes and streets for months and years. The bottom line, as Mayor Moore, I will take the handcuffs off our MPD officers and put them back on the growing criminal elements that terrorize and rundown our city-state.   - 17 JULY 2006 ©

DENNIS MOORE ON THE ISSUE:
Protecting the District of Columbia’s Environment
As the only mayoral candidate with actual environmental priorities and plans for our city-state --  with a full commitment to create a cabinet level 11-member Mayor’s Environment Advisory Council -- I provided direct answers to 8 critical questions for the District of Columbia Sierra Club:

1. PERSONAL BACKGROUND: Please describe what you have done to improve the quality of the natural environment in the District of Columbia.

Creating and expanding innovative solutions to incorporate more green space into neighborhoods and new housing construction will be a priority. The creative expansion and incorporation of green space is a major component in the natural filtration process for cleaner air. Additionally, as Mayor Moore, I will provide more vigorous and effective leadership on making the District a people/environment-friendly city-state. This will begin with greater enforcement and enhancement of environmental cleanup efforts, as well as swifter and more certain penalties against violators of DC's public health and environmental safety codes. A clean and safe urban environment will also be viewed by a Moore Administration as a critical healthcare and socioeconomic asset to the value and vitality of the District of Columbia.

2. GREEN BUILDING: In 2005, Council member Sharon Ambrose introduced legislation that would establish minimum environmental performance standards for new buildings in the District. Under the bill, District government buildings would be required to attain a rating of LEED "Silver" under the rating system established by the U.S. Green Building Council. Commercial buildings would be subject to lesser standards.

Will you support legislation that requires D.C. government buildings to be certified as LEED Silver, as the mayor has declared?

Yes. Also, I will work constantly to upgrade and enhance the environmental integrity of all DC government buildings by providing targeted and accountable funding to retrofit and renovate all District facilities to higher environmentally safe and sound standards. Additionally, I will propose graduated reduced tax incentives to both commercial and residential developers that meet or exceed the LEED "Silver" rating. A combination of tax incentives and enhanced building code amendments will be used to encourage existing commercial building owners to repair and upgrade their overall infrastructure to healthier and environmentally safe standards.

Will you support legislation that requires all new residential and commercial buildings to meet specified minimum environmental performance standards?

Yes. I will also propose graduated reduced tax incentives for developers of new and planned residential or commercial properties with the highest level and quantity of environmentally sound and structurally safe building materials -- especially developers that creatively and functionally incorporate sustainable user-friendly (ground-level or above-ground) green space into their building design.

3. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: An important way to improve our region's air quality and create more livable neighborhoods is to invest in maintaining and expanding our public transportation system.  In the last several years, the Sierra Club has pressed Metro to implement a series of recommendations to become more accountable to riders and has lobbied the D.C. Council and the Maryland and Virginia legislatures to establish a region-wide dedicated source of revenue for Metro to ensure that the system will be able to meet the transportation needs of the increasing number of people living in the Washington, D.C. region.

The District Department of Transportation has been studying alternatives for returning streetcars to D.C. streets and is expected to release its final study in the near future.  As envisioned, a 40-mile District-wide streetcar network could allow the city to grow by 100,000 residents without the nightmare of 100,000 new cars and the congestion, parking and air pollution problems they would bring. Evidence shows that streetcars can move several times more people than one lane of automobile traffic, and they have the potential to revitalize neighborhoods and improve access to commercial corridors.

Do you support investing in building a streetcar network in the District?

No. Even today, current streetcar technology is comparatively too operationally fixed and terrain limited. We need to merge the immediate and long-term advantages of intra-city public transportation's durability, and adaptability, to evolving and limited urban street plans. This is why I am in favor of small-size combined technology (ethanol, regenerative electric and solar powered) buses that can navigate the District's many irregular neighborhood streets -- without having to disturb neighborhoods to construct and maintain tracks or power lines, or be burdened by severe weather conditions. This will also extend and increase environmentally safe, convenient, and fiscally affordable public transportation to diverse underserved District communities. Additionally, in foresight, these same buses and other public and government vehicles can be mobilized and coordinated to quickly evacuate DC residents in the event of natural or manmade disasters and threats. ADDENDUM: Let it not be misconstrued, so-called streetcar (light-rail) public transit is not an option I’m totally against. My bottom line concern is that we don’t exchange one environmentally unsound system for another. Most light-rail systems under consideration or in use are powered by electricity produced by fossil fuel burning energy systems. Totally pollution-free and energy-renewable fuel cells, combined with supplemental solar energy panels, are most available and efficient for both light-rail and bus transit vehicles, as well as the station and bus stop fixtures. Additionally, this technology will enable diverse underserved DC residents more access to various sizes of neighborhood-based and mainline-connected transit. Fiscally speaking, we also save more taxpayer revenue over time, and improve the respiratory health (asthma, lung cancer, etc.) of District citizens. The more functional and accessible our public transit system is, the less DC drivers, District-bound commuters and tourists will engage in personal car use, gridlock, and pollution. My policies on environmentally sound transit will be rooted in holistic, innovative, long-term and fiscally responsible planning.

4. RECYCLING: Seventeen years ago the D.C. Recycling Act set the goal of recycling 45% of the District's waste stream.  Today, the city, by its own assessments, remains 20% short of that goal.  D.C.'s Office of Recycling says that the 45% goal is mathematically impossible unless we see increased participation from commercial sector properties. The Sierra Club agrees with this assessment. In 2005, the city made real progress toward its recycling goal by servicing the residential sector with a new single stream system.  The Sierra Club applauds these efforts. In 2006 and beyond, the challenge facing the city as it strives to meet its recycling goal is how to get commercial properties to participate.  

Do you support new funding for the Department of Public Works to hire at least one staff member for each of D.C.'s eight wards (currently there are only 4 staff members) who can be responsible for recycling education, inspection, and law enforcement in that ward?

Yes. Actually, providing guaranteed full funding for ten full time community-based Environmental Protection Agents for each ward is more operationally and logistically realistic. We need genuinely effective coverage for the variety of ward-based environmental issues that require constant monitoring, efficient management, earlier response and quicker resolution. I will not pay lip service, or play politics and politricks, on environmental and public health or safety issues. From my perspective, a truly protected environment is a key element in the overall healthcare, public safety and the long-term socioeconomic value of our city-state.

Will you renew the city's commitment to recycling by amending the Recycling Act of 1988 to ensure that the D.C. public schools set a good example for students by instituting recycling systems in all school system buildings and by teaching recycling in the classroom?

Yes. In fact, I will strongly encourage and fully fund an annual spring Environmental Awareness Month program to engage all public and charter school students, their parents, average citizens, government employees, public officials and interested tourists in diverse recycling, cleanup and event oriented environment activities. The Moore Administration will also develop educational partnerships with the Sierra Club, state and global environmental protection agencies, local organizations and educators to formulate an environmental studies curriculum for our elementary through high school students. I am a proponent of early, proactive and constant education to empower our youth with information that enables them to make lifelong smart decisions about the world they will inherit. By proxy, our youth will greatly influence adults and future lawmakers on making everyday smart decisions about protecting our urban and world environment.

5. CLEAN FUEL BUSES: Diesel exhaust contributes to the region's severe ozone smog problem, damages the lungs and heart, and is linked to cancer. The Sierra Club, with strong support from the D.C. Council, successfully persuaded Metro to stop buying dirty diesel buses in favor of much cleaner buses running on compressed natural gas (CNG). Metro built two CNG fueling facilities and purchased several hundred CNG buses. Metro had agreed to build a third CNG facility in Maryland, but Governor Ehrlich's appointee to the Metro Board forced Metro to reverse course and go back to buying diesel buses. Unfortunately, Mayor Williams' appointee to the Metro board supported the Ehrlich reversal. The D.C. Council has unanimously supported CNG Metro buses and opposed Metro's move back to diesel. 

Will you support policies that require Metro to buy only clean natural gas buses (or cleaner technology)?

Yes. My goal is to transition and convert all District Metro buses into ethanol, electric and solar powered vehicles over a five-year period. This will result in a higher level of clean energy powered surface public transportation, and provide exponential savings, improved air quality, and better respiratory health for all District residents and visitors. No doubt, becoming the first major city-state to have an entire public transportation system and government vehicles fleet powered by clean energy is one of my environmental priorities as mayor.

6. KLINGLE VALLEY: Klingle Valley, a stream valley that is an arm of Rock Creek Park, is the location of a narrow, two-lane road in NW that has been closed to automobiles since 1991 when a storm washed out a portion of the road and made it impassable. Rebuilding and reopening the road would pollute Rock Creek, harm mature trees alongside the road, and make the valley unsafe for recreational use at a cost of at least $7.2 million, according to recent estimates. For these reasons, the Sierra Club continues to support preserving Klingle Valley as a park without automobile traffic.  Currently, the District Department of Transportation is preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS) as a step toward rebuilding the road.

Will you support the Sierra Club's position of keeping Klingle Valley closed to automobiles and replacing the old road with a hiker/biker trail open for all District residents to use and enjoy for recreation?

Yes. It is my contention that Klingle Valley and Rock Creek Park must remain, and be consistently maintained, as one of our last most valuable natural urban preserves for current and future generations. Allowing personal and commercial vehicle traffic at any level will set a precedent for overuse in the future. However, allowing limited-schedule small electric shuttle buses to traverse select roads is a concept I will encourage. This will provide environment-friendly, quiet and convenient public transportation access, without being an obstruction to casual pedestrian traffic. Also, the shuttle buses can be an additional dedicated revenue source to fund protection and maintenance of this invaluable urban parkland.

7. ROCK CREEK PARK: Over the last several years, the National Park Service has been reviewing several alternative approaches for the future management of Rock Creek Park. The Sierra Club is on record as supporting Alternative 2½, a blend of Park Service alternatives that would close three segments of upper Beach Drive to commuter traffic 24-hours a day, seven days a week-not just on weekends, as it is currently managed-in order to increase recreational opportunities in our national park. In 2003, the Park Service proposed a compromise plan that would close the three segments to traffic on weekdays, but only during non-rush hour times-from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Subsequently, the Park Service scaled back its earlier proposal so that it would close only a single 1.5-mile segment of Beach Drive from Broad Branch Road north to Military Road on weekdays during the same mid-day, non-rush hour times.  However, in its final management plan, the Park Service proposed little more than speed bumps, which would fail to expand recreational opportunities in the park.

Will you support efforts to limit automobile traffic on upper Beach Drive on weekdays, and advocate that the National Park Service implement such management changes?

Yes. My personal and public policy perspectives on environmental protection are of the long-term view, and linked to present-day realities. Again, I will not engage in empty rhetoric and politricks regarding my implementation of environmental protection priorities and policies. Additionally, there is an economic component when we evaluate our green space as an asset that adds value to our city-state. Urban planners don't singularly valuate a city based on the abundance of concrete, steel and glass structures. Ubiquitous green space and public parklands have architecturally and historically been a major element in a city's true value and appreciation by both residents and visitors. Under the Moore Administration, this will be the guiding philosophy and public policy principle by which I will protect the District from further environmental deterioration. Leadership that is shortsighted, insensitive and dysfunctional about the exponential value of urban green space deserves no opportunity to lead.

Please elaborate. Under what circumstances would you support expanding the existing weekend closures to weekdays?

I believe it is equitable and environmentally sound to expand weekday closures to federal and District holidays, including 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. to 1 a.m. pedestrian access only periods. All other times (1 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.) must be reserved, and strictly enforced, for HOV passenger vehicles only. Passenger vehicle use at these times will be both convenient and relatively low due to the time frames and higher occupancy restrictions. Commercial vehicles will not be permitted at anytime. Certainly, I will reserve the option to reassess and revise these restrictions over time favoring public safety and environmental protection first.

8. BICYCLING: In spite of the clear benefits of promoting bicycling as a way to reduce traffic congestion, promote good health and prevent air pollution, key bicycle projects, such as the Metropolitan Branch Trail in Northeast D.C., continue to face obstacles.

What have you done to support efforts to encourage safe bicycling and walking in the District?

As mayor, and an avid weekend cyclist, I will expand and maintain the availability of bicycle paths throughout the District. Additionally, I will strictly enforce $200 fines to motivate non-cycling on sidewalks having witnessed a near terrible "accident" between a negligent iPod-engaged cyclist and a small child strolling with her parents. Sidewalks are strictly for walking, with or without a bike. Moreover, I will propose minimum fines of $500 and points against automobile drivers who don't yield to cyclists obeying traffic safety rules on streets with or without designated bike paths. Criminal negligence prosecution and incarceration will be aggressively enforced against all categories of powered vehicle drivers when a lawful cyclist is injured or killed.

If elected, what will you do to encourage safe bicycling and walking in the District?

I will fund programs for safe bicycling to and from our public and charter schools. As an avid walker and public transportation user, I will actively promote walking, cycling and public transit use. Broadcast, direct mail and Internet media will be used to promote free pedometers and annual cardiorespiratory exams to encourage walking as a lifelong healthy choice. Additionally, to promote expanded and safer bicycling, I will also sponsor a weekly 50-cent raffle ticket drawing to win one of five all-terrain bicycles. Revenue from raffle ticket purchases will be strictly used to promote safe bicycling, walking, District parklands preservation, and green space cleanup. Maintaining integrated and dedicated policies to create a higher level of health, fitness, environmental protection and related public safety will be my constant priority as mayor, and executive public advocate, for the District of Columbia -- and the future state of New Washington.

2006 Questionnaire for District of Columbia Mayoral Candidates

I was honored to answer 25 questions about some of the most critical concerns of our GLBT citizens in “The Nation’s Capital.” My honest responses stem from my roots as a traditional empowerment oriented Republican. As a DC mayoral candidate, firmly rooted in the traditional Republican history and principles of genuine socioeconomic empowerment and protection of human rights, my responses were instinctive. Since its founding by antislavery activists, progressive members of Congress and democratic idealists in 1854, and despite sociopolitical lapses, my principled answers remain consistent with the best and truest traditions of a legacy sustained by several generations of African American Republicans:

PUBLIC SAFETY
1. Will you support funding for mandatory gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) sensitivity and diversity training for all members of the Fire/EMS Department, starting with the first budget you submit to the Council?

Yes. It is critically important that subtle and overt insensitivity, disrespect and discrimination against any District GLBT citizen be checked through systemic professional training and career counseling. The Moore Administration will have a zero-tolerance policy regarding gender, sexual preference, ethnic, disability and religious bias by any District of Columbia government employee, agency or funded organization. Violations of this policy will be met with thorough and swift enforcement, reprimand, prosecution, and termination when appropriate. Consistently valuing and aggressively protecting the human rights of every District citizen will be a standard I will actively promote and sustain as Mayor Moore.

2. Will you appoint a new Fire/EMS Department Chief who is committed to rooting out the Department's deeply entrenched homophobia and transphobia?

Yes. But, first I will provide a 1-year benchmarked assessment period of improvements by the current Fire/EMS Chief, and immediate subordinates. If at the end of that period there aren’t appropriate and substantive improvements based on the benchmarks, the Chief will be immediately relieve of duty. Simultaneously, the Chief’s position will be filled by the subordinate with the best record of improvements based on the 1-year benchmarks.

3. Will you include representatives of the GLBT community in the search process when you appoint a new Police Chief and a new Fire/EMS Chief?

Yes. These GLBT representatives will come from the ranks of both the MPD and Fire/EMS departments, and will be composed of an equal number of five GLBT members of MPD and Fire/EMS agencies. An eleventh member elected by the council’s other ten members will head this GLBT Public Safety Advisory Council.

4. Are you committed to continuing the Gay & Lesbian Liaison Unit within the Metropolitan Police Department?

Yes. In fact, to be operationally effective throughout all District precincts, I seek to expand the GLLU to raise its level of sensitivity, outreach and effectiveness throughout our city-state. There will be no token half-step efforts to effectively respond to, and fully resolve, diverse GLBT issues within the MPD or Fire/EMS agencies.

5. Will you submit a budget request for the Office of Police Complaints that will be large enough to continue to avoid developing a backlog of cases?

No. I believe it would be most effective to create a temporary fully funded Board of Review and Resolution that will be charged with the responsibility of aggressively and effectively resolving the backlog of complaint cases. The board’s temporary status is rooted in their mandate to thoroughly review and resolve all outstanding complaints within an 18-month period to an effective and manageable level. Five GLBT members of MPD, five non-GLBT police officers, five civilian professional investigators and five regular civilian advocates will staff the board. The board will be fully and exclusively accountable to the mayor. After a thorough assessment of the Board of Review and Resolution’s 18-month effectiveness, the board will become permanent, and replace the Office of Police Complaints, if there are substantial improvements in case load resolution. Otherwise, the board will be dismissed and all unresolved cases will be turned over to the Office of Human Rights.

6. Will you ensure that the Department of Corrections enforces the District's Human Rights Act against contractors who discriminate against transgender visitors to correctional facilities?

Yes. The Moore Administration will have a zero-tolerance policy regarding gender, sexual preference, ethnic, disability and religious bias by any District of Columbia government employee, or agency. This policy will apply fully to any DC government contracted, compensated or funded entity. Violations of this policy will be met with thorough and swift enforcement, reprimand, prosecution, and termination when appropriate.

7. Will you oppose legislation creating so-called "prostitution-free zones," which would give the police, who routinely assume that every transgendered person is a prostitute until proven otherwise, virtually unlimited power to harass our transgendered residents?

Yes. As previously stated, and with emphasis, the Moore Administration will have a zero-tolerance policy regarding gender, sexual preference, ethnic, disability and religious bias by any District of Columbia government employee, or agency. Violations of this policy will be met with thorough and swift enforcement, reprimand, prosecution, and termination when appropriate. It will be my priority to provide leadership and effective motivation to create a substantive change from a culture of intolerance to one of respect for the human rights and dignity of every District of Columbia resident and visitor. The concept and legislation of “prostitution-free zones” is a superficial and a disguised form of discrimination that dilutes and distracts from truly effective public safety strategies. Our police officers must be empowered to effectively direct their efforts and resources to real safety issues that mutually threaten both GLBT and non-GLBT District citizens.

AIDS AND PUBLIC HEALTH
8. Will you ensure that the drive to make HIV testing routine among District residents includes funding for counseling and referrals to treatment facilities for those who test positive?

Yes. Consistent and thorough follow-up is a critical phase in reducing, and potentially eliminating, the rising levels of HIV and AIDS throughout the District. I believe, as Mayor Moore, it is important and most effective to have a holistic approach in aggressively and effectively saving the lives of the growing numbers of our infected citizens. My holistic approach will involve guaranteed full funding for testing, treatment, counseling, preventative information programs, expanded outreach to diverse GLBT and non-GLBT communities, as well as sensitivity training and information at all DC government levels.

9. Are you committed to continuing and strengthening the District's condom distribution program?

Yes. This involves the outreach, information, counseling and prevention part of my holistic approach to HIV/AIDS reductions. By doing so, I am confident there will be major reductions in the District’s infection and death rates. This approach will yield an exponential health and socioeconomic dividend that will safeguard the lives of every DC citizen, as we become a healthier city-state. Substantially reducing the District’s HIV/AIDS infections and deaths will not be a secondary effort during the Moore Administration. I will not play moral politics, or politricks, regarding proven and innovative approaches that improve and protect the health of my family, friends, associates and constituents throughout the Nation’s Capital.

10. The District is being forced by the federal government to switch from a unique identifier system to a names reporting system for people testing positive for HIV. Will you support legislation to strengthen our medical privacy laws, such as by creating a private right of action for those whose confidentiality is violated by District government employees or contractors?

Yes. The strengthening of our medical privacy laws is a key element in my zero-tolerance policy regarding gender, sexual preference, ethnic, disability and religious bias by any District of Columbia government employee, or agency. This policy will fully apply to any DC government contracted, compensated or funded entity. Violations of this policy will be met with thorough and swift enforcement, reprimand, prosecution, and termination when appropriate.

HUMAN RIGHTS
11. Will you submit a budget for the Office of Human Rights (OHR) large enough to allow it to reduce to 270 days the average gap between the time that a discrimination complaint is filed and the time OHR issues a finding of probable cause?

Yes. In fact, it will be my mission to expand the Office of Human Rights through an increase in investigative personnel and a guaranteed fully funded budget. Having a fully and effectively staffed OHR, with dedicated funding, is a major component in my effort to enforce a zero-tolerance policy regarding diverse forms of discrimination. As Mayor Moore, there will be no half-step measures in my efforts to aggressively develop and effectively motivate a systemic and cultural change in how violations of human rights are viewed and resolved. At its core and substance, my efforts are dedicated to developing a District-wide climate of mutual respect and unity among diverse DC residents and government personnel.

12. Will you refuse to issue proclamations and otherwise decline to honor individuals or organizations that promote any sort of bigotry?

Yes. As a matter of standard policy and governance, the Moore Administration will provide no honor or support to any individual or organization engaged in subtle or overt forms of bigotry. Again, it is imperative to me as Mayor Moore that I practice my personal principles in believing any form of actionable or verbalized bigotry violates the dignity and rights of everyone. When these violations are left unchecked, a message of acceptance and support is reinforced. I will effectively and aggressively pursue the extra measure of publicly rebuking anyone engaged in hate promotion, as well as eliminate any DC government funding related to the promoters’ operations. My personal and political beliefs regarding bigotry are historically and morally rooted in the same principles from which Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., another traditional and empowerment oriented Republican, practiced.

13. Will you refuse to appoint to your Interfaith Council ministers such as Bishop Owens and Rev. Willie Wilson who have publicly hurled vile language against members of the District's GLBT community?

Yes. Zero-tolerance means no tolerance. I will not allow the integrity of my personal beliefs, and standards of governance, be compromised by pretentious symbolism, politics and politricks on hate speech from anyone. Simultaneously, with regard to their public status, I will actively pursue every effective means of enlightening and motivating diverse individuals on the damages of any form of divisive rhetoric, hateful speech and discriminatory behavior to the socioeconomic success of a united city-state.

14. Will you invite representatives of GLAA to participate in the search process when you appoint a new Director of the Office of Human Rights, as Mayor Williams did in 2003?

No. Based on my standard, an invitation is considered a token half-measure. The full-measure will involve ensuring that GLAA representatives are integral major partners, in concert with other representatives, in the search, assessment and approval process of a new Office of Human Rights director. This standard will extend to other sectors of my administration where the expertise, insights and sensitivity of the GLBT community are essential to effective and equitable governance in the Moore Administration.

15. Are you committed to enforcing the provisions of the D.C. Human Rights Act forbidding discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression?

Yes. All in line with my previously stated zero-tolerance policies and priorities.

MARRIAGE AND FAMILY
16. Do you support legal recognition of marriages between partners of the same sex?

Yes. Simply and clearly, on the basis that every taxpaying citizen of the District of Columbia is an invested partner in the sustenance and support of our city-state, I will support legal recognition of marriages between partners of the same sex. Therefore, as a matter of common sense and commonly accepted legal principles, same-sex partners must be equitable recipients of the legal recognition provided to and enjoyed by all other District citizens. The rights of two consenting adults of the same gender to be married, as domestic partners, should be protected as a principle rooted in the basic and common rules of respect for all human rights that do not impede or violate the rights of others. Personally, and as Mayor Moore, this is my clear and morally uncomplicated understanding of the right of every adult human to partner with other adults they share a common and long term personal bond through a domestic partnership.

17. Will your Administration publicize and enforce the recently enacted laws that have significantly expanded the rights and responsibilities of domestic partners?

Yes. As a basic principle of equitable governance and full protection for every District citizen, domestic partners will be fully empowered to receive and benefit from the same rights enjoyed by all other DC residents. The bottom line for me, as the chief public advocate responsible for the protection of citizen interests, I will aggressively educate and effectively enforce all laws that protect and strengthen the rights of domestic partners. As taxpaying citizens and voting constituents, our fellow GLBT citizens are equal partners in the vitality, value and growth of the District of Columbia. Just as our society does not deny voting rights to GLBT citizens, we must not deny equal protection under the laws that they vote on. I clearly, and unambiguously, see my responsibility as sustaining those rights with the same integrity, vigor and consistency as will be sustained for non-GLBT District citizens.

18. Will you support legislation in the District to continue expanding the existing domestic partnership program to include all relevant rights and responsibilities of marriage in D.C. law?

Yes. But, this cannot be a token half-measure based on symbolism. I will only support legislation that effectively and substantively expands equitable enforcement of the relevant rights and responsibilities of marriage in District of Columbia law. My emphasis on this matter is rooted in my belief that this important issue must be significantly resolved so that all of us can more effectively direct our attention and energy to the common issues that affect both GLBT and non-GLBT District citizens -- common issues such as effective healthcare access, comprehensive public safety, genuinely affordable housing, high quality education, expanded employment opportunities, environmental protection, and genuine socioeconomic empowerment for diverse District of Columbia citizens.

19. Will you support the legislative and/or regulatory changes necessary to ensure that the District recognizes civil unions, domestic partnerships and similar legal relationships established in other jurisdictions?

Yes. I also will be attentive to those legislative and regulatory measures that are unique to the GLBT community in the District of Columbia. What works in Kansas or California may not complement the specific needs and goals of our fellow citizens in the GLBT community.

PUBLIC EDUCATION AND YOUTH
20. Do you oppose both federal and local voucher programs that fund students in religious schools that are beyond the protections of the D.C. Human Rights Act?

Yes. Taxpayer funded programs, supported by tax revenue generated from both non-GLBT and GLBT District citizens should not be used to support any entity that violates any part of the D.C. Human Rights Act. Frankly, for me, this is a legally equitable and fiscally responsible “no-brainer.” Again, this is another uncompromising element in my zero-tolerance discrimination policies as Mayor Moore. I will also make every effective effort to encourage and enlighten federal authorities to do the same.

21. Do you oppose the use of either federal or District taxpayer funds to promote "abstinence-only-until-marriage" sex education that undermines safer-sex programs by discouraging the use of condoms and that effectively tells gay and lesbian students that they must remain celibate forever because they may not legally marry?

I support substantive and effective programs that consistently and clearly educate both GLBT and non-GLBT District youth of the critical importance of protected-sexual activity, as well as functional options other than pre-marital sex -- while enabling direct parent or legal guardian involvement, including GLBT and non-GLBT youth advocacy groups, peer education and counseling programs. My immediate and long-term goal is to dramatically reduce the rate and quantity of diverse STD/HIV infections, unintended pregnancies, as well as pre-marital behaviors that result in domestic stress, violence or future domestic irresponsibility and infidelity as married or domestic partners. Condoms will be made available to non-adult GLBT and non-GLBT youth only after close consultations and receiving the written consent of their parent or legal guardian.

CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES
22. Do you support the relocation of the many gay bars and businesses that were displaced by the new ballpark, even if local NIMBYs and homophobes oppose them?

I am confident and supportive of the formidable cultural, market and economic forces in the District’s GLBT community to create and develop venues that best complement licensed GLBT-oriented businesses. In fact, the Moore Administration will provide equitable support and advocacy for the rights of legal GLBT-oriented businesses and the commonly accepted rights of the communities where these businesses operate, or propose to operate. As mayor, it will be imperative that both GLBT and non-GLBT businesses maintain good business citizenship and community outreach. I will actively encourage both communities to reach out and develop equitable community partnerships. I will be consistent in my personal efforts and governance at bringing communities together on common goals and needs. This too, is a critical part of my zero-tolerance initiative that I believe will stimulate and develop mutually supportive GLBT and non-GLBT partnerships to protect the common human rights of all District of Columbia citizens.

23. Will you support legislation to curb the abuses of NIMBYs who are now allowed to file an endless series of baseless complaints to harass or extort bars and restaurants?

Yes. Additionally, I will aggressively and effectively take the initiative to host quarterly community forums and permanent coalitions aimed at creating direct open dialogue between GLBT and non-GLBT citizens. Building a consensus to create a permanent, cabinet-level, Mayor’s Diversity Advisory Council will follow this initiative.

24. Do you oppose the Youth Protection from Obscene Video Games Act (B 16-0125), a clone of other laws that have consistently been struck down by the courts on constitutional grounds?

Yes. However, I will actively provide advocacy, and promote legal efforts, to diminish and restrict the distribution and marketing of violent and obscene video games to District children age 16 and younger. I believe, in the immediate and long term, that youth access and engagement through violent and obscene entertainment mediums has the potential to emotionally desensitize them. Speaking as a 53-year old father and grandfather, and longtime media professional, I know that this becomes a developmental process that can lead to youth and adult engagement in related violent and obscene behaviors. It is important for me, as a parent and public official, that I provide leadership and integrity on reducing the levels of violent, obscene and discriminatory behaviors that impact both GLBT and non-GLBT citizens throughout the District.

25. Please list any actions that you have taken that may help illustrate your record on behalf of gay men, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgenders.

I have no public record as such. Yet, undoubtedly I have aggressively lived and consistently self-empowered the courage of my convictions to respect and appreciate the value of diversity and rights of all people. My intimate awareness and sensitivity comes from my own experiences with family members, long time friends and professional associates that have been an integral part of my life for 53 years. No doubt, I will instinctively employ my personal convictions and commitment to human rights in the equitable governance and empowerment of all District of Columbia citizens.